Re: quaternion package to hg

[Lukas Reichlin]

On 18.06.2013, at 16:48, Carnë Draug <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 18 June 2013 12:18, Lukas Reichlin <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Hi Carnë
>> 
>> Could you please convert my package main/quaternion to hg as well?
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Lukas
> 
> Sure. I'm leaving some packages to the end because I'm unsure about
> the best way to deal with moves across different packages. The
> quaternion package has already been in:
> 
> extra/quaternion_oo
> main/quaternion
> 
> Just to be sure, "extra/quaternion-legacy" is a completely separate
> development history, right? I'm unsure of what the best way to do this
> but I'm thinking of keep all three in the same repo and then rearrange
> it. What do you think? I don't think we should be keeping the *-legacy
> stuff in Octave Forge, what we did with database seems much saner to
> me. We are after all using revision control.
> 
> Also, I'll strip the binaries file (PDF files only in the case of
> quaternion) from history which have been committed by accident with
> new releases.
> 
> Carnë

Hi Carnë

The packages

extra/quaternion-legacy
extra/control-legacy

are outdated and should not be included with quaternion and control. I just 
hesitated to delete them. Maybe you can leave them in the remaining svn repo.

Lukas