Re: octclip and geometry package

[Carnë Draug]

On 20 June 2013 11:52, José Luis García Pallero <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2013/6/20 Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Carnë Draug <address@hidden>
>> > Also, we are moving all of Octave forge to individual mercurial repos.
>> > I noticed that you already have one in bitbucket. When you created it,
>> > you didn't convert the old history. If you are interested, I could get
>> > you a mercurial repo with all of the old history until the point they
>> > diverge. I'm guessing it should be possible to graft your new history
>> > on it.
>
> Yes, the main development was done using the mercurial bitbucket repo. In
> this repository is all the history, from its creation in may 2005

The first commit of that repo is May 2011. I noticed the date 2005 on
the source code and assumed that there was history before that. I just
noticed that the SVN repository also starts on 2011. I will remove the
directory main/octclip in the svn repository and upload a clone of
your mercurial repo. Is that ok?

On 20 June 2013 12:01, José Luis García Pallero <address@hidden> wrote:
> 2013/6/20 Juan Pablo Carbajal <address@hidden>
>> As far as svn log is telling me, José's updates on 2012-10 are in the
>> subpackages and the subpackage has a bug correction reported by Rafael
>> therefore the independet octclip package seems outdated.
>
> What is the bug reported? I have no notice about

Because geometry copied the code from octclip the bug was only
reported to the geometry package and only fixed there.

I think Juan's referring to r11273[1] I'm not sure if it's needed in
octclip or if it was caused by the way geometry handles it's multiple
subpackages organization. One other commit (r11638) changes the same
Makefile.

Carnë

[1] https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11273
[2] https://sourceforge.net/p/octave/code/11638