[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New recruit!
From: |
Pascal Dupuis |
Subject: |
Re: New recruit! |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Jun 2013 18:32:19 +0200 |
Hello Richard,
A place where I find Octave could be better is about high-precision
arithmetic. Currently, a matrix is considered as badly scaled if its
condition number is smaller than 10^16; with some kind of simulations
this is a limiting factor.
There are a number of higher precision libs: Gnu MPL, ARPREC, MPACK, ...
Supporting higher precision means
1) choosing some lib
2) integrating it smoothly inside Octave
3) make either a new octave type, either a new octave class available
in order to support it
4) imagine how to bind this new type with the octave core functions,
in particular the fortran libs
Regards
Pascal
2013/6/24 Richard Clift <address@hidden>:
> Hey,
> I'm a PhD in applied maths in england and I want to improve my programming
> so I thought it be a good idea to help out Octave.
> I thought I start off small and then increasingly to more and more!
> so i'm open to suggestions hopefully I can help :)
> Richard
Re: New recruit!, c., 2013/06/25