[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Spying, privacy, and Octave
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Spying, privacy, and Octave |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:07:34 -0400 |
On 26 June 2013 11:40, John Swensen <address@hidden> wrote:
> While I am against governmental monitoring as much as the next person, isn't
> the intention of broadcasting the conference for wide public dissemination
> of the content.
Sure, but some people should be able to attend without their
activities being broadcast. I also know that jwe would like to have
some private talks about certain sensitive issues.
I'm not saying nothing should be broadcast, but some things shouldn't be.
> For personal and private communications any of the open-source,
Open source is a development methodology. Its stated goals are only
tangentially related to ensuring people's freedom to decide what to
broadcast or not.
> can we not just "use something that works"?
That's why I asked if Jitsi works or not.
- Jordi G. H.
- Spying, privacy, and Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2013/06/26
- Re: Spying, privacy, and Octave, Ben Abbott, 2013/06/26
- Re: Spying, privacy, and Octave, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2013/06/26
- Re: Spying, privacy, and Octave, John Swensen, 2013/06/26