octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MXE Octave: Cannot find Ghostscript


From: PhilipNienhuis
Subject: Re: MXE Octave: Cannot find Ghostscript
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2013 11:06:17 -0700 (PDT)

Anirudha Bose wrote
> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Michael Goffioul <

> michael.goffioul@

>> wrote:
> 
>> On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 4:12 AM, Anirudha Bose &lt;

> ani07nov@

> &gt; wrote:
>>
>>> I am natively compiling mxe-octave during which the package pstoedit
>>> failed to build because of the following error.
>>>
>>> checking for gs... no
>>> configure: error: ** Cannot find ghostscript. If it is already
>>> installed,
>>> Check PATH.
>>> make[1]: *** [build-only-pstoedit] Error 1
>>> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/ani/mxe-octave'
>>>
>>>
>>> As a matter of fact, I have Ghostscript installed in the path
>>> C:\gs\gs9.07\
>>> I have also added the path C:\gs\gs9.07\bin to the Path environment
>>> variable. I am unable to figure out why Ghostscript is not found by
>>> pstoedit (entering gswin32 in the shell opens Ghostscript, so my
>>> environment variable settings are correct). I also added another
>>> variable
>>> GS with the same path but it didn't work. What am I doing wrong?
>>>
>>
>> If the pstoedit configure script is looking for "gs" executable, then
>> it's
>> normal it's failing. Under Windows, the executable is called gswin32 or
>> gswin32c. If this is not fixed upstream in some newer version of
>> pstoedit,
>> then we'll have to patch pstoedit to handle the Windows case properly.
>>
> 
> Renaming the file gswin32.exe to gs.exe also achieves the same thing.

That shouldn't be needed anymore - this bug has been fixed quite a while ago
- see bug #36076.

Anirudha probably has another issue with ghostscript.

Philip



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/MXE-Octave-Cannot-find-Ghostscript-tp4655045p4655053.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]