|
From: | Marco Vassallo |
Subject: | RE: fem-fenics |
Date: | Fri, 5 Jul 2013 22:54:53 +0200 |
> Subject: Re: fem-fenics
> From: address@hidden > Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 09:58:41 +0200 > To: address@hidden > CC: address@hidden > > > On 5 Jul 2013, at 09:29, Marco Vassallo <address@hidden> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > the test for each step should be just the single block which we will later include in > > the comprehensive test, or it should be something different and which tests the class deeply? > > For each step in the development, as defined in your timeline, you should write enough tests to make shure > what you developed during that step behaves correctly. In a sense the tests you write should just be a more > precise way of defining the timeline. > > so yes, your tests should be something more detailed than > > ffc ("Laplace.ufl"); > V = FunctionSpace (mshd); > sd = SubDomain (mesh, @(x, y) abs (x - 1.0) < eps); > bc = DirichletBC (V, @(x, y) 0.0, sd); > > A = BilinearForm (V, V, bc); > L = linearForm (V, bc); > > and morover they should contain assertions that may be used to decide > whether the test is passing or not, e.g. > > assert (issymmetric (A), true) > assert (norm (sum (A, 2), inf), eps) > > to test that the matrix produced by the assembly is symmetric and its columns sum to 0. > Ideally each method of each class you implement should have at least one test. Hi, these seems to be very useful test, thanks. I would also like to test them against bim with something like: A_bim = bim2a_advection_diffusion (mesh, 1, 1, 1, 0);> > don't worry if either the main test or the smaller ones are not correct from the beginning, > developement is an iterative process so you will have to refine them as you go. for some of the other methods which we should write, I can hardly imagine a test different from the main code.. For example, I don't know what I could test over a FunctionSpace.. V = FunctionSpace (mshd, "Laplace"); For the mesh class at the moment I have just implemented the method which initializes the mesh from a dolfin.xml mesh or from a (p, e ,t) format, because I assume that the mesh objects are manipulated using the msh pkg. Marco > > > Thanks > > Marco > > c. |
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |