[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: building default not possible?
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
Re: building default not possible? |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Jul 2013 03:16:31 +0100 |
On 8 July 2013 20:12, Torsten <address@hidden> wrote:
> [...] but there are still a bunch of warnings during
> compilation of __magick_read__.cc:
>
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:406:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:406:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'nargout' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:874:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1010:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1157:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:1215:1: warning: unused
> parameter 'args' [-Wunused-parameter]
> ../../libinterp/dldfcn/__magick_read__.cc:378:1: warning: 'void
> maybe_initialize_magick()' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
And you didn't had those warnings before? The missing include was my
fault, but those warnings come from parts I didn't touch. They seem to
warn about arguments that are used only if you HAVE_MAGICK (and you
don't). Same for maybe_initialize_magick() which does nothing in your
case. Should I enclose the whole thing in a ifdef HAVE_MAGICK, rather
than just the code inside?
Carnë