bpabbott wrote
>Using your scripts, the result doesn't look as bad as what you posted.
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave.png>
Yep; remarkably. I really don't follow why your result is so much better
with the same script.
The plots I posted were the same on Windows and Linux. Does OSX handle
graphics a bit differently?
Did you have the changesets by Panxto & Rik applied as well?
>If I make a slight modification ...
>
> margins.top = min (margins.top, margins.row);
> margins.bottom = min (margins.bottom, margins.row);
> margins.right = min (margins.right, margins.column);
> margins.left = min (margins.left, margins.column);
>
>Then I get a bit more improvement ...
<http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n4655825/brug-octave-modified.png>
>
>I think this change would be ok and improve the esthetics. If you agree,
>I'll push a change.
As for me I'd like even higher subplots (less empty space in between), more
like the first ("good") example I posted.
But first I'd like to know how come you get so much different results with
the same script.
Philip