[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m
From: |
Rik |
Subject: |
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Jul 2013 17:22:11 -0700 |
On 07/21/2013 02:26 PM, address@hidden wrote:
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2013 22:24:38 +0200
> From: Stefan Mahr <address@hidden>
> To: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
> Cc: octave maintainers mailing list <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
>
>> > oops! The test only fails for me the 1st time it is run, and only because
>> > the axes handles are in the wrong order.
>> >
>> > Ben
> It's weird. With your test script I get the same results as you.
> However, the resulting output still has different y-axis size for both
> plots.
>
> If I copy-paste your example block-wise in interactive mode, I get more
> errors. Could it be some kind of timing problem?
That might be the case, especially if there are listeners involved.
Another possibility is that we shut off some updating while we are in the
middle of an update. This is done to avoid infinite loops, but we might be
doing it incorrectly.
--Rik
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, (continued)
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/22
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/22
- Re: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2013/07/22
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, John W. Eaton, 2013/07/22
- Re: __plt_get_axis_arg__, Rik, 2013/07/22
- Re: __plt_get_axis_arg__, Michael D. Godfrey, 2013/07/22
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/25
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/25
- Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Ben Abbott, 2013/07/25
- Aw: Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m, Stefan Mahr, 2013/07/25
Re: changes to graphics.cc and subplot.m,
Rik <=