[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Compatibility considerations of "clear"
From: |
Philipp Kutin |
Subject: |
Re: Compatibility considerations of "clear" |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Aug 2013 21:54:16 +0200 |
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:25 PM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> We aren't stupid, you don't have to spell out every little detail. We know
> what a workspace is, y'know?
Um, I didn't describe it in such detail because I assumed all of you
"stupid", but to agree on a common mental model for how the language
maps names to values... the exact semantics of scope, and so on. After
all, you did get that one detail wrong, and even if you "know what a
workspace is", tiny differences like these may have a significant
impact in how the software is perceived when you're supposedly giving
much weight to compatibility.
--Philipp
Re: Compatibility considerations of "clear", Julien Bect, 2013/08/15
Re: Compatibility considerations of "clear", Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2013/08/14