[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: documenting how DEFUN interpreter functions can be called in C++
|
From: |
c. |
|
Subject: |
Re: documenting how DEFUN interpreter functions can be called in C++ |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Nov 2013 09:48:15 +0100 |
On 18 Nov 2013, at 08:37, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 11/17/2013 06:38 PM, c. wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Would it make sense to document in the manual how DEFUN
>> interpreter functions can be called in t C++?
>> Would this changeset be OK for that purpose?
>
> It might also be good to note that the list of built-in functions can change.
> We make no guarantees that a function that is currently built in won't be
> implemented as a .m file or as a dynamically linked function in the future.
>
> jwe
I added this comment and tried to push, but I am again having problems with
mercurial creating extra heads.
I posted an enquiry about this in a different thread.
c.