|
From: | Michael Goffioul |
Subject: | Fwd: New package |
Date: | Tue, 22 Jul 2014 10:37:30 -0400 |
2014-07-22 15:48 GMT+02:00 Ben Abbott <address@hidden>:
On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:37 AM, Guillermo Moliní <address@hidden> wrote:The terms of the GNU license make it illegal. Or has the source code for the cuda code been made freely available?
> 2014-07-22 15:31 GMT+02:00 Carlo de Falco <address@hidden>:
> I am afraid what you want to do is not legally possible.
> Please Do NOT post your code here.
> c.
>
> What do you mean with not legally possible?
> If you mean that cuda is propietary, id say thats true, but im not modifying anything, just making use of the api. There are other examples of opensource libraries that do the same, like http://managedcuda.codeplex.com/
Ben
What terms of the GNU License make it illegal? the link I just gave you above also has a GNU Library General Public License (LGPL), and does what I intend to do. That is, provide a wrapper (in that case for c#, in mine for octave), so that the cuda api can be used. Couldnt it be considered the cuda API as a system library under section 7?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |