[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A case for C++11 in Octave
From: |
Michael Godfrey |
Subject: |
Re: A case for C++11 in Octave |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Nov 2014 15:35:49 -0800 (PST) |
John,
Previously I said that C++11 might be justified. In doing this I set
aside experience much like yours. It is unfortunate that the community
developing C++ and other components has not developed a
plan which could lead to long-term stability.
In any case, I think that your choice is the right one.
Michael
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/A-case-for-C-11-in-Octave-tp4667350p4667378.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, (continued)
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Carnë Draug, 2014/11/14
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, c., 2014/11/15
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Mike Miller, 2014/11/15
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Carnë Draug, 2014/11/16
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, c., 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Michael Godfrey, 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Mike Miller, 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Michael Goffioul, 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, John W. Eaton, 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/11/17
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave,
Michael Godfrey <=
- Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, c., 2014/11/15
Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Thomas Weber, 2014/11/17
Re: A case for C++11 in Octave, Michael Godfrey, 2014/11/14