octave-maintainers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [FORGE] updating sockets


From: Juan Pablo Carbajal
Subject: Re: [FORGE] updating sockets
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 21:12:22 +0100

On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:05 PM, Paul Dreik <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> On 2014-12-03 16:24, Juan Pablo Carbajal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I guess is time to release a new sockets package, even if only to
>> remove the deprecation warning.
>>
>> Since a while I am trying to get something nice working to connect
>> Octave and Python. I found ØMQ [1] and I thought we should pimp up the
>> socket package to use ØMQ + some package creator (I am looking at JSON
>> and MSGPACK).
>>
>> What do you think of this?
>> Do you see any problems (like license issues, etc... it shouldn't ØMQ is 
>> LGPL)
>> Do you have suggestions?
>>
>
> Hi!
> It has been a while since I touched the sockets package. In this case,
> "no news is good news".
>
> 1)
> what do you mean by deprecation warning? it still builds and works fine,
> as far as I know? The only open bug I can find is #111 which is related
> to mingw. (See point 3 for more on that topic)
>
> 2)
> ØMQ may be a splendid piece of software, but please create a separate
> package for it. The sockets package should be used for sockets. Other
> packages can depend on it, if they need sockets and can use them from
> octave rather than c++.
>
> 3)
> Carne prepared for a sockets 1.2.0 release almost a year ago. I have
> polished a bit on the news, and I think it is fit for release.
> Unfortunately I currently do not have easy access to windows. Is it
> possible to run the windows release under wine, to be able to test? Or
> is there some other octave developer who wants to volunteer trying on
> windows (especially mingw)?
>
> With that said, I just pushed 1.2.0 to sourceforge. Please find a
> tarball attached to this mail.
>
> Paul

Paul,

Ok, we will start a zmp package. Do not worry! :D
I will start a new thread when I have my first working code.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]