[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave 4.0.0 release candidate 4 available for ftp
From: |
Carnë Draug |
Subject: |
Re: octave 4.0.0 release candidate 4 available for ftp |
Date: |
Fri, 1 May 2015 16:58:12 +0100 |
On 1 May 2015 at 15:47, Andreas Weber <address@hidden> wrote:
> Am 01.05.2015 um 15:16 schrieb Carnë Draug:
>> On 29 April 2015 at 19:07, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> The fourth release candidate for Octave 4.0.0 is available from
>>>
>> CentOS 6.6 --- Dual Core AMD Opteron Processor 280 --- gcc 4.4.7
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> <snip>
>> Failing tests:
>>
>> * __osmesa_print__.cc: maybe needs more tolerance but may be related to
>> a nvidia graphics card
>>
>> libGL error: failed to open drm device: Permission denied
>> libGL error: failed to load driver: nouveau
>> [...]
>> !!!!! test failed
>> ASSERT errors for: assert (stat (fn).size,7438,-0.1)
>>
>> Location | Observed | Expected | Reason
>> () 6180 7438 Rel err 0.16913 exceeds tol 0.1
>
> This is interesting, if you run this test manually, is the generated
> print visually correct or garbage?
>
Yes, the image looks right.
> Do you have a better idea to check the generated image? My idea was to
> use a rought image fingerprint (sum of rgb pixels) to check if the image
> is correct.
>
If we can count on imread, the figure is displayed with imshow, and
__osmesa_print__ saves a bitmap with lossless format instead of svg,
then it would be easy to compare, since the figure would be the same.
Carnë