Re: statistics package more suitable for nlinfit et al.? (was: Re: nlinfit in octave)

[Olaf Till]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:29:16AM -0400, Nir Krakauer wrote:
> My view is that if the Optimization package will be required anyway,
> keeping nlinfit in it is the more user-friendly choice compared to
> introducing an extra dependency for the Statistics package.

I've committed and pushed nlinfit and the statset suite to optim.

Thanks,

Olaf

-- 
public key id EAFE0591, e.g. on x-hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net

signature.asc
Description: Digital signature