|
| From: | John W. Eaton |
| Subject: | Re: uint64_t usage |
| Date: | Tue, 06 Oct 2015 15:15:58 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0 |
On 10/06/2015 02:49 PM, Mike Miller wrote:
But now I see that there are other places in Octave that seem to use u?int64_t unconditionally, so maybe this doesn't matter in practice.
I suppose it is possible that someone might try to build Octave on a system without 64-bit integer types, but I don't know what that would be at this point. Which (commonly used) systems does GCC still support that lack 64-bit integers?
jwe
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |