Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit
the main index
.
You can also
download the archives in mbox format
.
octave-maintainers (date)
[
Thread Index
][
Top
][
All Lists
][
octave-maintainers info page
]
Advanced
[
Prev Period
]
Last Modified: Mon Feb 29 2016 23:17:48 -0500
Messages in reverse chronological order
[
Next Period
]
February 29, 2016
Re: GEN doc/interpreter/gplot.txt
,
Ben Abbott
,
23:17
Re: GNU Octave has been accepted as a GSoC 2016 mentor organization
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
17:12
GNU Octave has been accepted as a GSoC 2016 mentor organization
,
Nir Krakauer
,
15:37
Re: GEN doc/interpreter/gplot.txt
,
Ben Abbott
,
14:11
octave forge package windows 1.2.3 released
,
JohnD
,
13:36
Re: GEN doc/interpreter/gplot.txt
,
Mike Miller
,
13:28
February 28, 2016
closing Octave-Forge svn repository
,
Carnë Draug
,
19:06
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Olaf Till
,
16:21
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Carnë Draug
,
15:49
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Olaf Till
,
14:44
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Carnë Draug
,
14:27
Testing sqrtm
,
Mudit Sharma
,
12:51
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Olaf Till
,
11:50
February 27, 2016
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Carnë Draug
,
19:12
GEN doc/interpreter/gplot.txt
,
Ben Abbott
,
18:12
Re: octave forge package zeromq 1.0.0 released
,
Doug Stewart
,
18:12
octave forge package zeromq 1.0.0 released
,
John Donoghue
,
16:59
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso
,
16:24
Re: Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Carnë Draug
,
11:48
Can you move the 'database' package to mercurial?
,
Olaf Till
,
08:45
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Mudit Sharma
,
08:36
February 26, 2016
Re: visibility attributes
,
Rik
,
12:46
Re: visibility attributes
,
Rik
,
12:36
Re: nan 3.0 or 3.0.0?
,
Carnë Draug
,
09:30
Re: nan 3.0 or 3.0.0?
,
John Donoghue
,
06:23
February 25, 2016
nan 3.0 or 3.0.0?
,
Marius Schamschula
,
22:00
nan 3.0 or 3.0.0?
,
Marius Schamschula
,
22:00
Re: symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
LachlanA
,
18:51
Re: OCTAVE_HELP vs HELP_OCTAVE
,
John W. Eaton
,
17:09
Re: OCTAVE_HELP vs HELP_OCTAVE
,
Mike Miller
,
16:59
Re: OCTAVE_HELP vs HELP_OCTAVE
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:49
Re: OCTAVE_HELP vs HELP_OCTAVE
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:40
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:33
Re: symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:30
Re: symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:23
Re: Does plotting with QT requires gl2ps?
,
Mike Miller
,
14:23
Re: default clang on Debian
,
José Luis García Pallero
,
13:52
Re: HTML export of profiler data
,
John W. Eaton
,
13:49
Re: HTML export of profiler data
,
Daniel Kraft
,
13:42
Does plotting with QT requires gl2ps?
,
Sebastian Schöps
,
13:32
Re: HTML export of profiler data
,
John W. Eaton
,
13:28
Re: HTML export of profiler data
,
Daniel Kraft
,
13:19
Re: default clang on Debian
,
John W. Eaton
,
12:57
Re: default clang on Debian
,
Mike Miller
,
12:48
Re: Octave-maintainers Digest, Vol 119, Issue 55
,
Rik
,
12:37
Re: default clang on Debian
,
Rik
,
12:35
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
10:15
Re: HTML export of profiler data
,
Julien Bect
,
03:08
February 24, 2016
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
23:19
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
Richard Crozier
,
17:44
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
13:46
HTML export of profiler data
,
Daniel Kraft
,
13:24
Re: Help needed with suspicious code in Sparse.cc
,
John W. Eaton
,
13:13
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
13:13
Re: Help needed with suspicious code in Sparse.cc
,
Rik
,
13:08
Help needed with suspicious code in KeyboardTranslater.cpp
,
John W. Eaton
,
12:53
RE: octave forge Windows package maintainer
,
JohnD
,
12:43
Re: octave forge Windows package maintainer
,
Carnë Draug
,
12:41
Re: symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
Rik
,
12:24
Help needed with suspicious code in Sparse.cc
,
John W. Eaton
,
12:19
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
12:15
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
10:46
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
10:33
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
09:42
octave forge Windows package maintainer
,
JohnD
,
09:29
Re: symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
Olaf Till
,
03:52
February 23, 2016
symtab.h: why so many function bodies
,
LachlanA
,
23:49
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
John W. Eaton
,
22:44
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
22:17
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
21:38
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
Mike Miller
,
21:36
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
21:35
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
20:44
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
20:15
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
18:18
OCTAVE_HELP vs HELP_OCTAVE
,
Mike Miller
,
16:46
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
15:27
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
15:23
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:07
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
12:45
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
12:43
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
Rik
,
12:27
Re: octave-zeromq
,
JohnD
,
12:23
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Rik
,
11:55
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
Richard Crozier
,
09:37
Re: Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
John W. Eaton
,
09:16
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
09:14
Expected behaviour of dbtype
,
Richard Crozier
,
08:36
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
08:34
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
07:58
February 22, 2016
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
19:48
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
16:15
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
16:04
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
15:07
RE: octave-zeromq
,
JohnD
,
14:25
Re: octave-zeromq
,
Colin Macdonald
,
14:22
Re: octave-zeromq
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
14:06
octave-zeromq
,
JohnD
,
13:07
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Rik
,
12:25
February 21, 2016
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Ben Abbott
,
20:47
February 20, 2016
Re: Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:16
Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64:
,
Ben Abbott
,
13:37
Re: Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
Orion Poplawski
,
10:35
Re: g++ 6 abs() issue
,
Orion Poplawski
,
10:29
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Carnë Draug
,
10:22
Re: Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
John W. Eaton
,
10:16
Re: Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
John W. Eaton
,
09:49
February 19, 2016
g++ 6 abs() issue
,
Orion Poplawski
,
22:09
Fwd: Re: Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
Orion Poplawski
,
21:06
Re: C++11 now default?
,
LachlanA
,
20:20
Re: Flaky mercurial archive access?
,
Keith Keith
,
19:06
Major issues with g++ 6 and gnulib
,
Orion Poplawski
,
18:33
Re: Flaky mercurial archive access?
,
Keith Keith
,
16:59
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Rik
,
16:54
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
16:34
Re: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Final hours to submit your GSoC 2016 Org application
,
Nir Krakauer
,
12:42
Fwd: [GSoC Mentors Announce] Final hours to submit your GSoC 2016 Org application
,
Doug Stewart
,
12:31
Re: Flaky mercurial archive access?
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
12:27
Re: Flaky mercurial archive access?
,
Doug Stewart
,
12:03
Flaky mercurial archive access?
,
Rik
,
11:58
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
JuanPi
,
10:53
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
Nir Krakauer
,
10:52
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
Nir Krakauer
,
10:50
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
JuanPi
,
10:50
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
Michele Martone
,
10:46
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
JuanPi
,
10:30
Re: C++11 now default?
,
John W. Eaton
,
09:55
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
Michele Martone
,
09:35
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
Michele Martone
,
08:43
Re: Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
JuanPi
,
08:34
Symmetric Matrices: time and space efficient represenation
,
JuanPi
,
08:11
request information: configuring for build or cross-build except for GNU/Linux
,
Olaf Till
,
03:06
February 18, 2016
Re: mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
23:44
Re: C++11 now default?
,
Mike Miller
,
21:15
C++11 now default?
,
Rik
,
20:30
Re: mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
16:08
RE: mex and gdal
,
JohnD
,
15:16
Re: mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
14:31
RE: mex and gdal
,
JohnD
,
13:47
Re: mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
13:17
RE: mex and gdal
,
JohnD
,
13:02
Re: mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
12:53
RE: mex and gdal
,
JohnD
,
12:34
mex and gdal
,
Doug Stewart
,
08:09
February 17, 2016
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
Rik
,
19:09
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
Mike Miller
,
16:22
Re: octave-config-h?
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:55
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:30
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
Mike Miller
,
14:39
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
John W. Eaton
,
14:16
Re: Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
Mike Miller
,
12:56
Requiring Bourne shell for build
,
Rik
,
12:45
Re: A beginenr wishing to get involved
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
10:00
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
06:12
About improving sqrtm
,
Marco Caliari
,
03:52
Re: A beginenr wishing to get involved
,
Mike Miller
,
03:35
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Julien Bect
,
02:27
February 16, 2016
Re: A beginenr wishing to get involved
,
Keith Keith
,
18:09
Re: A beginenr wishing to get involved
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
16:48
A beginenr wishing to get involved
,
Ben Ph
,
16:43
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
13:07
Re: Website update
,
Alex Krolick
,
12:47
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Carnë Draug
,
12:32
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
12:11
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Marco Atzeri
,
12:10
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Mudit Sharma
,
11:45
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
John W. Eaton
,
11:02
Re: Improving sqrtm
,
Keith Keith
,
10:43
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Carlo de Falco
,
03:11
Improving sqrtm
,
Mudit Sharma
,
03:11
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Marco Caliari
,
03:09
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Julien Bect
,
02:03
Re: Website update
,
Daniel J Sebald
,
00:54
February 15, 2016
Website update
,
Alex Krolick
,
23:12
Re: sort indexing
,
John W. Eaton
,
20:47
Re: sort indexing
,
Daniel J Sebald
,
20:12
Re: sort indexing
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
19:43
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
17:55
Re: sort indexing
,
Daniel J Sebald
,
16:10
sort indexing
,
Doug Stewart
,
15:39
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Julien Bect
,
05:38
February 14, 2016
Code sprint in Zürich, CH
,
JuanPi
,
13:24
Re: Please close bug #47144
,
PhilipNienhuis
,
13:22
Please close bug #47144
,
JuanPi
,
13:01
Re: Can I make maintainer status of optim package 'official'? (was: Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim))
,
Carnë Draug
,
07:47
Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim)
,
Olaf Till
,
05:23
Can I make maintainer status of optim package 'official'? (was: Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim))
,
Olaf Till
,
05:21
February 13, 2016
interval 1.4.1 released
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
03:19
Re: icon is empty : octave-4.0.1-rc3 for windows
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
03:13
icon is empty : octave-4.0.1-rc3 for windows
,
Tatsuro MATSUOKA
,
01:26
February 12, 2016
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Mike Miller
,
21:16
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Ben Abbott
,
20:48
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Keith Keith
,
20:25
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Mike Miller
,
20:10
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Ben Abbott
,
19:44
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Sebastian Schöps
,
18:16
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Keith Keith
,
17:27
Re: octave-config-h?
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:24
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Julien Bect
,
11:41
Re: Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Sebastian Schöps
,
10:44
Matlab compatibility or not Matlab compatibility
,
Julien Bect
,
10:23
Re: octave-config-h?
,
Ben Abbott
,
09:02
octave-config-h?
,
Ben Abbott
,
07:33
February 11, 2016
Re: interval 1.4.0 released
,
Przemek Klosowski
,
12:24
February 10, 2016
Re: We need to talk about SourceForge
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
18:18
Re: interval 1.4.0 released
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
17:05
Re: interval 1.4.0 released
,
Przemek Klosowski
,
12:26
interval package 0.2.1
,
Przemek Klosowski
,
12:26
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Marco Caliari
,
12:07
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Carnë Draug
,
06:40
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
06:26
February 09, 2016
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Michael Godfrey
,
22:40
Re: interval 1.4.0 released
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
13:15
Re: interval 1.4.0 released
,
Marius Schamschula
,
13:14
interval 1.4.0 released
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
12:37
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Nir Krakauer
,
11:20
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Carlo De Falco
,
10:39
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
09:42
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
fredy alexander hoyos ariza
,
09:23
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
09:13
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Carlo De Falco
,
08:21
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Olaf Till
,
06:10
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Julien Bect
,
05:49
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
05:39
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
John W. Eaton
,
05:29
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Colin Macdonald
,
04:12
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Julien Bect
,
02:56
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Fredy Hoyos
,
01:06
February 08, 2016
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Carnë Draug
,
21:16
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
18:46
Jupiter
,
JuanPi
,
18:37
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Julien Bect
,
16:38
Re: Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Olaf Till
,
15:57
Why does Octave ignore additional input arguments ?
,
Julien Bect
,
12:59
Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim)
,
Olaf Till
,
03:54
February 07, 2016
Re: WAVELET TOOLBOX FOR OCTAVE
,
Carnë Draug
,
20:24
Re: Adding metainfo.xml files to each pkg
,
Carnë Draug
,
18:49
Re: RFC: quadprog/lsqlin with __qp__ (Re: GSoC 2015, optim)
,
Nir Krakauer
,
18:02
Re: package licenses - use of SPDX identifiers
,
Mike Miller
,
16:22
Re: package licenses - use of SPDX identifiers
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
16:16
Re: package licenses - use of SPDX identifiers
,
Carnë Draug
,
16:03
geometry-2.1.0 package release
,
JuanPi
,
12:09
Re: having trouble with XTRA_CFLAGS showing up on AM_CXXFLAGS
,
John W. Eaton
,
10:39
Re: XTRA_CFLAGS
,
Rik
,
10:09
Re: having trouble with XTRA_CFLAGS showing up on AM_CXXFLAGS
,
Carnë Draug
,
09:24
mapping-1.2.1 package released
,
Philip Nienhuis
,
06:14
Re: package licenses - use of SPDX identifiers
,
Oliver Heimlich
,
05:28
Re: having trouble with XTRA_CFLAGS showing up on AM_CXXFLAGS
,
John W. Eaton
,
02:35
Re: no longer able to build default on MacOS X
,
John W. Eaton
,
02:25
February 06, 2016
having trouble with XTRA_CFLAGS showing up on AM_CXXFLAGS
,
Carnë Draug
,
22:42
Re: no longer able to build default on MacOS X
,
Ben Abbott
,
20:27
Re: no longer able to build default on MacOS X
,
Ben Abbott
,
19:58
package licenses - use of SPDX identifiers
,
Carnë Draug
,
19:51
no longer able to build default on MacOS X
,
Ben Abbott
,
18:03
February 05, 2016
Re: [MXE] "libinterp/co refcn/sighandlers.cc:392:35: error: 'strsignal' was not declared in this scope"
,
PhilipNienhuis
,
01:58
February 04, 2016
Re: indenting preprocessor conditionals
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:50
Re: [MXE] "libinterp/co refcn/sighandlers.cc:392:35: error: 'strsignal' was not declared in this scope"
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:47
[MXE] "libinterp/co refcn/sighandlers.cc:392:35: error: 'strsignal' was not declared in this scope"
,
PhilipNienhuis
,
13:59
February 03, 2016
Re: indenting preprocessor conditionals
,
Rik
,
18:23
Re: heads up: changes that require manual intervention
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
18:17
Re: heads up: changes that require manual intervention
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
18:10
Re: heads up: changes that require manual intervention
,
John W. Eaton
,
17:59
Re: heads up: changes that require manual intervention
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
17:56
heads up: changes that require manual intervention
,
John W. Eaton
,
15:15
February 02, 2016
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Juan Pablo Carbajal
,
17:31
Re: indenting preprocessor conditionals?
,
Mike Miller
,
17:09
Re: Line length for code?
,
John W. Eaton
,
14:57
Re: Line length for code?
,
Colin Macdonald
,
14:51
indenting preprocessor conditionals?
,
John W. Eaton
,
14:51
Re: Line length for code?
,
John W. Eaton
,
14:36
financial 0.5.0 released
,
Parsiad Azimzadeh
,
14:16
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Nicholas Jankowski
,
14:06
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Rik
,
13:21
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Carlo De Falco
,
06:57
Re: GSOC 2016
,
Nir Krakauer
,
03:36
February 01, 2016
Re: Debugging output
,
Richard Crozier
,
06:16
[
Prev Period
]
[
Next Period
]
Mail converted by
MHonArc