Re: let's keep printf, puts, and scanf

[John W. Eaton]

On 04/21/2016 04:23 AM, Kai Torben Ohlhus wrote:

> So if there are no objections, or an unmistakably no, I will come up
> with a reduced version of the cset, only making puts, fputs, printf and
> scanf (not deprecate) M-files next week.

The way things are now, an error in printf will display the function 
name "printf".  If you change printf to be an M-file wrapper around 
fprintf, errors will display the name "fprintf" unless you make a lot of 
other changes to make error reporting work correctly for these wrapper 
functions.  So I'd say please just leave this alone.  It's worked fine 
for probably more than 20 years and I don't see any need to change it now.

jwe