[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: make doxygen on java
From: |
Ernst Reissner |
Subject: |
Re: make doxygen on java |
Date: |
Wed, 3 Aug 2016 22:26:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2 |
On 08/03/2016 08:55 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
> On 3 August 2016 at 17:42, Ernst Reissner <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 08/03/2016 05:49 PM, Carnë Draug wrote:
>>> On 3 August 2016 at 10:28, Ernst Reissner <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I try to produce doxygen comments.
>>>>
>>>> To check whether all links are ok, I would like to try sth like make doc
>>>>
>>>> but i cannot find the according makefile..
>>>>
>>>> I build in .build.
>>>>
>>> Hi Ernst
>>>
>>> Nice to see more people working on that. Use "make doxyhtml" as mentioned
>>> in
>>> http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/file/46b67f1569b5/doc/doxyhtml/README
>>>
>>> Carnë
>>>
>> Thank you Carne,
>> I just documented java-sources in scripts/java/org/octave/
>> But no output reached html....
>>
>> Sth to be added to the makefiles???
>>
> I didn't realize you were trying to write docs for that. I thought you
> were documenting ov-java. The java classes in org.octave are not really
> exposed anywhere so I'm not sure it makes sense to have them on the public
> doxygen docs.
>
> Actually, why do we even have those classes? Can't we use the JNI and
> have everything in C++ in ov-java.cc?
>
I think, ov-java is merely a wrapper around the java classes.
I would say, these are the core.
I think the lot of reflection is difficult to reimplement in c++ and
also, this makes no sense.
I would appreciate to have these classes documented.
We have c++ documented, also m-files, why not java?