[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is gnuplot version 5 requirements for octave 4.2?
From: |
Tatsuro MATSUOKA |
Subject: |
Re: Is gnuplot version 5 requirements for octave 4.2? |
Date: |
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:56:37 +0900 (JST) |
>ᐧ
>
>
>On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:38 AM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>>
>>> From: Ben Abbott
>>> To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
>>> Cc: Ben Abbott ; octave-maintainers
>>> Date: 2016/8/21, Sun 09:07
>>> Subject: Re: Is gnuplot version 5 requirements for octave 4.2?
>>>
>>>> On Aug 20, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA
>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> This is discussed on another thread.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://octave.1599824.n4. nabble.com/Updated-octave-
>>> plot-compare-td4679338.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> In the thread, it is discussed whether upcoming octave 4.2 should support
>>> gnuplot 4.6.
>>>>
>>>> I wrote
>>>>
>>>> ****************************** *********************
>>>> I only use ubuntu and lububtu for linux distribution.
>>>>
>>>> I have installed lubuntu 16.04 to a PC. Default gnuplot version is 4.6.6.
>>>> And it also have gnuplot5 packages and their version is 5.0.3.
>>>>
>>>> However, ubuntu 14.04 LTS, which is still used by many people, does not
>>> have
>>>> gnuplot 5.0 in official repo. nor ppa.
>>>>
>>>> Dmitri wrote
>>>>
>>>> ****************************** ****************************** *******
>>>> If this distribution did not get around to update to a newer version
>>>> of gnuplot I am pretty sure they would not update update octave either.
>>>> People who would want to compile their own new version of octave can as
>>>> well compile a newer version of gnuplot (and install it in some special
>>> location
>>>> if they want to keep the old version).
>>>> So I think we should keep 5.x version of gnuplot as a requirement for the
>>>> upcoming octave 4.2 release.
>>>> ....
>>>>
>>>> Is gnuplot version 5 requirements for octave 4.2?
>>>> For windows, mxe-octave provides gnuplot 5.0.4.
>>>> For Mac OS X, pre-built gnuplot 5 seem to be available.
>>>> On major commercial OS, drop of gnuplot 4.6 seem not to be a problem.
>>>> For users who use linux distributions (or other Unix family?), this is a
>>>> problem.
>>>>
>>>> Tatsuro
>>>
>>> Is there a a problem with 4.6 support, or maybe there is a problem
>>> supporting
>>> both 5.0 and 4.6?
>>>
>>> Ben
>>
>>
>>
>>In the reply to Dmitri in the original thread, Edmund wrote
>>****************************** *************************
>>Dimitri,
>>
>> If you don't want to support LTS releases you should say so explicitly to
>>the Ubuntu maintainers, I believe.
>> I have quite a few Mac VM users of Trusty Tahr Ubuntu LTS who are using my
>>script to download Octave from the "stable" ppa. Now that I have read your
>>position on this I will migrate to a newer version, but of course migration
>>snowballs into non-regression testing. Which is precisely what LTS releases
>>are designed to minimise. As for your position that "users" should compile
>>Octave or Gnuplot, please understand that it is not shared by all of this
>>list, or at least not shared by some of the idiots on this list.
>>
>>Edmund
>>****************************** ***************************
>>
>>Again I will write this point.
>>This is originally discussed :
>>http://octave.1599824.n4. nabble.com/Updated-octave-
>>plot-compare-td4679338.html
>>
>>
>>But the topic of gnuplot is not scope of original thread so that I made a new
>>thread.
>>
>>Tatsuro
>>
>
>From: edmund ronald
>To: Tatsuro MATSUOKA
>Cc: Ben Abbott ; Octave Maintainers ; Dmitri A. Sergatskov
>Date: 2016/8/22, Mon 07:41
>Subject: Re: Is gnuplot version 5 requirements for octave 4.2?
>
>
>I've got lost. If you can send a list email that lands in the correct place
>please do so, otherwise I give up - and you've solved your problem.
>
>
>Edmund
Your reply to the above point to my new thread.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2016-08/msg00285.html
(Nabble archive has a little delay so that I have pointed to the gnu archive.)
If you have further opinion, please reply this or successive mails.
Tatsuro