[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: terminals_with_size
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: terminals_with_size |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2016 18:17:34 -0700 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/ (1.7.0) |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 18:00:05 -0700, Rik wrote:
> On 09/14/2016 05:44 PM, Tatsuro MATSUOKA wrote:
> > I do not see "qt".
> >
> > The qt terminal is implemented from gnuplot 4.6 and default terminal from
> > gnuplot 5.0.
>
> Is qt a terminal_with_size? I don't know. Someone who understands gnuplot
> and Octave can chime in on whether it should be added to the list.
>From the gnuplot help, it seems that the qt terminal does support a
"size" option. I think it should be added to this block. I notice that
figure ("position", [0, 0, 1000, 200])
works when using GNUTERM=x11, but not when GNUTERM=qt. This may have
something to do with that.
--
mike
- Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Mike Miller, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, John W. Eaton, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: Minimum gnuplot version for Octave 4.2?, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/15
- Re: terminals_with_size, Dmitri A. Sergatskov, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/15
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/15
- Re: terminals_with_size, Tatsuro MATSUOKA, 2016/09/14
- Re: terminals_with_size, Ben Abbott, 2016/09/15
- Message not available
- Re: terminals_with_size, Rik, 2016/09/14