Re: Re:Note for future GSoCers and others

[NVS Abhilash]

Mudit Sharma wrote
>>I know, sorry I didn't knew that. Thank you for your guidance, really
> appreciate it.
>>So as a beginner I think I should start with a small one then.
> 
> Yes.
> 
>>I am sorry, I was not able to know the size of the project. So for small
>>projects, should I look for something in here:
>>
>> http://wiki.octave.org/Short_projects
> <http://wiki.octave.org/Short_projects>
> 
>>Can I start with making some missing functions, It's just that I wanna
> start
> contributing.
> 
>>Thank you,
>>NVS Abhilash
> 
> Octave community has always enjoyed the young contributor's effort.
> I think the short projects' page is the best way to provide the community
> with
> good missing functions. Make sure whatever you implement is
> state-of-the-art
> or at par with Octave's cousin Matlab. With that said you need to do a
> literature survey
> of the function that you want to implement.
> 
> Bests,
> Mudit

Cool, I'll try my best.
Thanks Mudit for all your efforts.

Cheers
NVS



-----
NVS Abhilash
--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Re-Note-for-future-GSoCers-and-others-tp4680225p4680233.html
Sent from the Octave - Maintainers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.