[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release |
Date: |
Mon, 21 Aug 2017 16:51:07 -0700 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 01:21:37 +0200, Oliver Heimlich wrote:
> This leads me to the conclusion that I would eventually want to remove
> the .itl files from this project entirely and probably publish them
> together with the python scripts somewhere else. However, this can
> still be done after this release. I don't see this as a blocking issue.
> To put it in a positive way: the situation has already been improved
> compared to the previous release.
Thanks for explaining the history and context. For my part I think your
approach looks good, and I don't see any reason to not distribute the
test vectors as a mat file the way you are doing, and publish the
intermediate files and scripts separately.
--
mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, (continued)
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Olaf Till, 2017/08/20
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Olaf Till, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Olaf Till, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Mike Miller, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Julien Bect, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Oliver Heimlich, 2017/08/21
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release,
Mike Miller <=
- Re: pending interval-3.0.0 release, Olaf Till, 2017/08/22