Re: Buildbot Progress

[Dmitri A. Sergatskov]

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:31 AM, John W. Eaton <address@hidden> wrote:

On 01/09/2018 12:25 PM, Rik wrote:

Making progress.  Clang on Mac OSX is now green.  The package of-control
now compiles which, alas, just uncovered the next problem further down with
of-signal.

It is all green now.  I'm sure that's the first time this has happened for this set of builds.

​Somebody jinxed it :) ​

http://buildbot.octave.org:8010/builders/clang-5.0-debian/builds/249/steps/test/logs/stdio

libinterp/corefcn/bsxfun.cc-tst ............................. PASS     75/76  
                                                                  FAIL    1

***** test
 funs = address@hidden, @minus, @times, @rdivide, @ldivide, @power, @max, @min, ...
         @rem, @mod, @atan2, @hypot, @eq, @ne, @lt, @le, @gt, @ge, ...
         @and, @or, @xor };

 float_types = address@hidden, @double};
 int_types = address@hidden, @int16, @int32, @int64, ...
              @uint8, @uint16, @uint32, @uint64};

 x = rand (3) * 10-5;
 y = rand (3,1) * 10-5;

 for i=1:length (funs)
   for j = 1:length (float_types)
     for k = 1:length (int_types)

       fun = funs{i};
       f_type = float_types{j};
       i_type = int_types{k};

         assert (bsxfun (fun, f_type (x), i_type (y)), ...
                 fun (f_type(x), i_type (y)));
         assert (bsxfun (fun, f_type (y), i_type (x)), ...
                 fun (f_type(y), i_type (x)));

         assert (bsxfun (fun, i_type (x), i_type (y)), ...
                 fun (i_type (x), i_type (y)));
         assert (bsxfun (fun, i_type (y), i_type (x)), ...
                 fun (i_type (y), i_type (x)));

         assert (bsxfun (fun, f_type (x), f_type (y)), ...
                 fun (f_type (x), f_type (y)));
         assert (bsxfun (fun, f_type(y), f_type(x)), ...
                 fun (f_type (y), f_type (x)));
     endfor
   endfor
 endfor
!!!!! test failed
ASSERT errors for:  assert (bsxfun (fun, f_type (x), i_type (y)),fun (f_type (x), i_type (y)))

  Location  |  Observed  |  Expected  |  Reason
   (1,3)       52597681     52597680     Abs err 1 exceeds tol 0 by 1


​I thought Mike Miller addressed this particular problem, but I could not find the thread / bug report.
..
​Should we just fix a seed for rand() in this test?

jwe

​Dmitri.

--

​