[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #8303] vectorized parcellfun and pararrayfun

[Olaf Till]

Follow-up Comment #5, patch #8303 (project octave):

I can't see a user advantage of enough generality from your example. Why
should a user function which performs element-wise computations in arrays
permute its inputs or outputs? Should not the inputs and outputs be maintained
in already the correctly permuted form? This would be faster, too.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8303>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/