[Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #8812] Added imquantize to image toolset

[Guy B]

Follow-up Comment #9, patch #8812 (project octave):

It does seem to work for the special case in which you only want to label
regions and not assign them costume values.

But it shouldn't work according to the documentation... in fact, I can't see
how the documentation on this function is correct.

Did I miss anything? 

>From help lookup:


If table is increasing and 'idx = lookup (table, y)', then
     'table(idx(i)) <= y(i) < table(idx(i+1))' for all 'y(i)' within the
     table.  If 'y(i) < table(1)' then 'idx(i)' is 0.  If 'y(i) >=
     table(end)' or 'isnan (y(i))' then 'idx(i)' is 'n'.

     If the table is decreasing, then the tests are reversed.  For
     non-strictly monotonic tables, empty intervals are always skipped.
     The result is undefined if TABLE is not monotonic, or if TABLE
     contains a NaN.

     The complexity of the lookup is O(M*log(N)) where N is the size of
     TABLE and M is the size of Y.  In the special case when Y is also
     sorted, the complexity is O(min(M*log(N),M+N)).

    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?8812>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/