|
From: | Markus Mützel |
Subject: | [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9924] Suggestion for a memory() function |
Date: | Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:08:27 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:76.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/76.0 |
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #9924 (project octave): The attached patch adds the function to Octave core as described in comment #5. I also removed the type prefixes from the field names of the sys structure. So the output here is now: >> [proc, sys] = __wmemory__ () proc = scalar structure containing the fields: PageFaultCount = 88269 PeakWorkingSetSize = 1.8433e+08 WorkingSetSize = 1.5598e+08 QuotaPeakPagedPoolUsage = 960136 QuotaPagedPoolUsage = 960088 QuotaPeakNonPagedPoolUsage = 60424 QuotaNonPagedPoolUsage = 59752 PagefileUsage = 1.3471e+08 PeakPagefileUsage = 1.7294e+08 sys = scalar structure containing the fields: MemoryLoad = 52 TotalPhys = 3.4225e+10 AvailPhys = 1.6182e+10 TotalPageFile = 3.6372e+10 AvailPageFile = 1.2927e+10 TotalVirtual = 1.4074e+14 AvailVirtual = 1.4073e+14 AvailExtendedVirtual = 0 (file #48900) _______________________________________________________ Additional Item Attachment: File name: patch9924_wmemory.patch Size:4 KB <https://savannah.gnu.org/file/patch9924_wmemory.patch?file_id=48900> _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9924> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |