|
From: | anonymous |
Subject: | [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9974] [octave forge](mapping) gc2sc scxsc gcxsc |
Date: | Thu, 8 Oct 2020 13:38:58 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/78.0 |
Follow-up Comment #10, patch #9974 (project octave): Thank you for looking into this. I have read and understand how I could have used only vectors. I hope to have some time to look and understand comment #8 and comment #9 It looks like you are seeing some good corner cases to test. As you said s.o. was a good starting point. If you get to it before me there would be no issues. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great-circle_distance#Computational_formulas States specifically use haversine for small distances. If your results are robust then the code can be cleaner. _______________________________________________________ Reply to this item at: <https://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9974> _______________________________________________ Message sent via Savannah https://savannah.gnu.org/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |