Re: [Octave-patch-tracker] [patch #9000] Polygon functions for geometry/mapping package

[Juan Pablo Carbajal]

On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Juan Pablo Carbajal
<ajuanpi+dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 11:36 PM, Philip Nienhuis
> <INVALID.NOREPLY@gnu.org> wrote:
>> Follow-up Comment #19, patch #9000 (project octave):
>>
>> JuanPi and Amr:
>> Just to let you know that I picked up integrating Amr's contribution into the
>> geometry/mapping packages. I think most of it should go in geometry.
>>
>> @JuanPi: I didn't know that you had already absorbed some of my contributions
>> in the geometry package, thanks for that. (I found out through perusing the
>> log of Amr's code on bitbucket.org.)
>>
>> In the next days /weeks I'll send a few comments / suggestions; I've almost
>> finished my "review" of Amr's work from package maintainer's POV. Hopefully I
>> do not step (too much) on your territory, JuanPi :-)
>>
> Go ahead and merge, we can alsways interate further once the material
> is in the repo and working.
> I will try to catch up as soon as I can...currently, swamped.
>
>> - Almost all functions need fixes for octave coding style
>>
> Let's do that afterwards the things are running.
> You should open a branch (maybe a bookmark) for this update.
>
>> - polybool etc only works with boost-1.60 while currently boost-1.61 is
>> current. In spite of what John Swensen apparently interpreted, boost-1.60
>> features self-intersection well.
>>
> if boost is not present, do we loose some functions. If thatis thecae
> then we might need to adapt the makefile to use Carnë's trick to avoid
> providing useless functions.
>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________________
>>
>> Reply to this item at:
>>
>>   <http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?9000>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>   Message sent via/by Savannah
>>   http://savannah.gnu.org/
>>

Hi, I will have time soon., where are the latest advances?
I am still using sourceforge as main repo.