[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[osip-dev] oSIP possible issue with the header field Allow

From: Liagre, Michel (External)
Subject: [osip-dev] oSIP possible issue with the header field Allow
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 17:03:19 +0200

Hi everyone,

Since the upgrade to the oSIP 3.5.0 version, (old version 3.0.1) we are facing an issue in the Allow header field.

The header Allow field in a response message is now splited into as much methods as it contains in the osip structure.

Here is an example of the INIVTE request: (correctly coded)

Request-Line: INVITE sip:address@hidden;user=user SIP/2.0
Message Header
        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP address:port;rport;branch=branch
        Max-Forwards: 70
        From: <sip:address@hidden;user=user>;tag=tag
        To: <sip: address@hidden;user=user>
        Contact: <sip: address@hidden;user=user>
        Call-ID: AzS.r.zergJ25K501fgVp-Ma65zeg3ON
        CSeq: 14410 INVITE
        Route: <sip:address@hidden;lr>
        MIME-Version: 1.0
        Priority: 5;a
        Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ISSI P25 body"
        Content-Length: 329
    Message body

Here is the response sent by our application: (Allow field splitted)

Status-Line: SIP/2.0 100 Trying
    Message Header
        Via: SIP/2.0/UDP address:port;rport=port;branch=branch
        From: <sip: address@hidden;user=user>;tag=tag
        To: <sip: address@hidden;user=user>
        Call-ID: AiY AzS.r.zergJ25K501fgVp-Ma65zeg3ON
        CSeq: 14410 INVITE
        Allow: INVITE
        Allow: ACK
        Allow: BYE
        Allow: CANCEL
        Allow: REGISTER
        Allow: MESSAGE
        Allow: OPTIONS
        Content-Length: 0

I noticed a major change in the parser in the function : "_osip_message_to_str()" in osipparser2/osip_message_to_str.c.

The function previously used for the header Allow "strcat_headers_all_on_one_line()" is now deactived (#if 0) and replaced by "strcat_headers_all_on_one_line()".

Now the RFC 3261 specify that the header Allow MUST contain the list of the methods and not consecutive header for the same field.

Could it be a bug or something?

Thanks a lot,

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]