Re: [Pan-users] Anyone still using 0.11.3? ... then read this

[Himanshu J. Gohel]

Colin Leroy wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 22:55:47 -0700 "Himanshu Gohel" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > And I didn't get any new files recently.  Are the bug fixes in the
> > 0.11.4 tarball committed to the pan-0-11-fix branch?
> 
> No, nowhere, these were just plain .diff files to apply on a 0.11.3
> release. What you're running now is 0.11.3.90 which does not have every
> bugfix included in 0.11.4, but has features backported from 0.12 branch
> (unsupported etc).
> You can try to apply the diffs, some apply correctly, they are here:
> http://colino.net/pan/

Thanks Colin.  I looked at the ChangeLog in the pan-0-11-fix branch and
compared the backport bug ID#s to the ones on your site, and I found
that these were not committed:

72435.diff - Pan crashes when trying to unsubscribe from alt.cats
72555.diff - selecting "Get bodies with articles" doesn't download the
bodies
80292.diff - save articles does not create directory tree
82262.diff - crashes on shift-s for mult. binary
82828.diff - Posting without a subject generates incorrect error
82865.diff - selected several articles for deletion
84987.diff - qp encoding doesn't work
85725.diff - Unable to attach filter to renamed newsgroup

I downloaded them, and applied them to my cvs tree using 'patch -p1 ...'
and I had only one partial failure:

Aum 20% patch -p1 < ../80292.diff
Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|--- pan-0.11.3-orig/pan/task-save.c    Thu Jan 10 06:39:59 2002
|+++ pan-0.11.3/pan/task-save.c Sat Jul 13 14:47:26 2002
--------------------------
Patching file pan/task-save.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 454.
Hunk #2 succeeded at 498 (offset 4 lines).
1 out of 2 hunks failed--saving rejects to pan/task-save.c.rej
done


Ofcourse, I don't know if my source is now in an incosistent state, but
I'm getting some compile errors.  Most likely these are because I
recently updated my GNOME/GTK to the latest 1.4 versions from SGI
Freeware (pre-built), I'll have to reconfigure/rebuild all to rule that
out.

Any chance these can be committed to the fix branch for posterity? 
Thanks.

-- 
Himanshu Gohel, mailto:address@hidden