[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Pan-users] pan-0-11-fix, 0.11.3.90, and 0.11.4 summary
From: |
Charles Kerr |
Subject: |
[Pan-users] pan-0-11-fix, 0.11.3.90, and 0.11.4 summary |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:08:36 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.20i |
Just to clear the waters on this a little bit, here's the whole
story on the different development branches:
0-11-fix
During the development of 0.12.0, Colin and I backported a lot of
the new stuff into 0-11-fix -- probably about half of the non-gtk2
changes. Backporting was a lot of effort, and Colin and I both
were busy with other things, so the backporting effort dropped off.
As a result 0-11-fix has (a) some nice things not in 0.11.4, and
(b) a lot of untested code. Colin says it works fine for him, so
some users may want to build 0-11-fix.
From my perspective, though, the 0-11-fix backports were a mistake:
If we had continued with the effort and released nearly-identical
versions of Pan for Gnome 1.4 (0.11.4) and gtk 2 (0.12.0), then I
would've had to field bug reports for both releases, keep bugfixes
in sync, and generally use a lot of time for the benefit of people
who don't want to install to gtk2 yet. IMO that's a temporary
audience: 0.12.1 downloads outnumber 0.11.4 by a two-to-one margin.
And most users get Pan via their distro, which will also ship with gtk2.
0.11.4
0.11.4 is 0.11.3 plus about a dozen bugfixes. Since 0-11-fix was
in an unknown state, I made 0.11.4 by checking out "pan-0-11-3"
from CVS and applying the fixes.
0.11.3.90
Was never released. Since the diffs between 0.11.3 and 0.11.4 were
all few-lines-of-code bugfixes that were already in production in 0.12.x,
I gambled that it would be okay to release them without a 0.11 beta.
0-12-fix
The lesson I learned from 0-11-fix is that these fix branches should
*only* be for fixes. So 0-12-fix should always be usable and stable.
HEAD
Interesting and scary stuff. Toolbars, spellchecking, and a
nasty Followup-To bug. :)
cheers,
Charles