[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks
From: |
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Mar 2003 14:55:50 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 08:20:13AM +0000, Brian Morrison wrote:
> Even now the 2.4 kernel series can fall over when all virtual memory is
> consumed.
just about any OS will fall over if/when it runs completely out of memory.
there *is* an option somewhere in recent kernels (don't remember if it's
compile-time or runtime), that will allow you to turn off memory
overcommitment; i.e. the kernel will only allow programs to allocate a total
amount of memory <= RAM + swap.
this still doesn't catch all cases; but most of them.
http://kt.zork.net/kernel-traffic/latest.html#11
be interesting to see what happens in the case of pan grabbing all the
memory it can, but not being allowed to overcommit. I'm thinking it would
just fall over, but hopefully not take anything else down with it.
of course, this is still bad behavior, and should be dealt with in any case.
:)
Carl.
--
Systems Administrator
Real-Time Enterprises
www.real-time.com
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, (continued)
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Brian Morrison, 2003/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Steven Ellis, 2003/03/09
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Duncan, 2003/03/10
- RE: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Chris Charlebois, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Steven Ellis, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Eric Ortega, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Charles Kerr, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Steven Ellis, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Eric Ortega, 2003/03/12
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Brian Morrison, 2003/03/10
- Re: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks,
Carl Wilhelm Soderstrom <=
RE: [Pan-users] 0.13.4 memory leaks, Kelly, Mark, 2003/03/11