[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?
From: |
Joe Zeff |
Subject: |
Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ? |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Dec 2008 14:57:23 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) |
On 12/07/2008 David Shochat wrote:
No, that was a directory (as shown by the initial 'd'). For a
directory, the 'x' means search access (there is no such thing as
executing a directory). For an ordinary file, it would mean execute
access.
-- David
I sit corrected. Live and learn. Thank you.
--
Joe Zeff
If you can't play with words, what good are they?
http://www.zeff.us http://www.lasfs.info
- [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, (continued)
- [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Duncan, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, David Shochat, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Kurt Schilling, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Joe Zeff, 2008/12/07
- [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Duncan, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, David Shochat, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Joe Zeff, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, David Shochat, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?,
Joe Zeff <=
- [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Duncan, 2008/12/07
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Steven D'Aprano, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Joe Zeff, 2008/12/14
- Re: [Pan-users] Re: compile ?, Travis, 2008/12/14