pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Pan-users] 64-Bit Windows build


From: Steve Davies
Subject: Re: [Pan-users] 64-Bit Windows build
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 09:57:18 +0000

Bugzilla - That would have been the best answer - particularly as I already have an account now you mention it! :)

While I am here - the following is from memory, I'm away from my pan dev environment.

I notice that COMPRESS_GZIP and ENABLE_COMPRESS_GZIP are defined in compress.h, which is #included in many places, but both values are used only once each in nntp.c - On my version of g++ this causes many "defined but not used" compile warnings. Would it be better to move those 2 lines into nntp.c? Or replace them with #defines?

Just a thought...

Thanks,
Steve

On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 at 23:51 Petr Kovar <address@hidden> wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:31:22 +0100
Steve Davies <address@hidden> wrote:

> On 25/04/2017 20:23, Petr Kovar wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, happens to me too (I had not noticed!) on Windows 10.
> >>
> >> I'll try and update everything I can and re-build. It is not a
> >> fundamental date formatting issue because the article pane shows the
> >> date just fine...
> > Was just wondering, do you build Pan with GTK+ 2 or 3? I wouldn't be
> > surprised if this was a problem in older versions of GTK+.
> >
> > pk
> >
> GTK+3 is not yet usable on Windows builds as far as I can tell, but I
> did find the issue - Not sure how to submit the following, so here is a
> "patch" for you to check and merge if you like it.

Thanks, Steve, for a quick fix! :)

> commit cfbf70be8e083b8a35fc94fad5d5c902c024a223
> Author: Steve Davies <address@hidden>
> Date:   Tue Apr 25 20:13:33 2017 +0100
>
>      Fix the strftime test for mingw64
>
>      mingw64's strftime returns an empty string when the %l and %h
> tokens are not understood.
>
> diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
> index 4caae04..cce6c24 100644
> --- a/configure.ac
> +++ b/configure.ac
> @@ -240,13 +240,14 @@ dnl Check to see if strftime supports the use of
> %l and %k
>   AC_MSG_CHECKING(for %l and %k support in strftime)
>   AC_RUN_IFELSE([AC_LANG_SOURCE([[
>   #include <string.h>
> +#include <stdlib.h>
>   #include <time.h>
>   int main(int argc, char **argv) {
>     char buf[10];
>     time_t rawtime = time(0);
>     struct tm *timeinfo = localtime (&rawtime);
>     strftime(buf, 10, "%l %k", timeinfo);
> -  exit (strstr(buf, "l") || strstr(buf, "k") || !strcmp(buf," "));
> +  exit (strstr(buf, "l") || strstr(buf, "k") || !strcmp(buf," ") ||
> !strlen(buf));
>   }]])],[
>   AC_DEFINE(HAVE_LKSTRFTIME, 1, [strftime supports use of l and k])
>   ac_cv_lkstrftime=yes
>
>
> The above will probably be destroyed in-transit :(
> Steve

Yeah, the line breaks didn't survive it, so I recreated it manually. I
think it's better to send it as an attachment, since git format-patch
creates a patch in a mail format. Or, pan is mirrored on GitHub if you're
there. Or, Bugzilla...

Cheers,
pk

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]