Re: [Paparazzi-devel] update rate for IR sensor

[Tilman Baumann]

On a related note. Why have all paparazzi IMU so far been addon modules
with considerate computing power on board?
Would it not be cheaper to have the filtering and integration done on the
paparazzi board?
There is probably a good reason for that, I wonder what it is. Compute
power or just the fact that others have already solved the problem?

Sorry for the noise, but I was always wondering about this. All IMU
referenced n the wiki are very expensive, and I wonder if this needs to be
so.

 Tilman


C.KUO wrote:
>    The IMU we are use is connect to tiny though SPI as we want to use
> other chip to compute attitude information.