[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions
From: |
antoine drouin |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jun 2011 07:58:45 +0200 |
ppm on lisa/M works, and so does it on lisa/L
Regards
Poine
ps: on lisa/M, PPM is at the moment sharing a line with servo6 (
because it's the way it was wired on lisa/L ). It would be trivial to
adapt the driver to use another line. look at
sw/airborne/arch/stm32/subsystems/radio_control/ppm_arch.c
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Eric Parsonage <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Chris
>
>
>> I emailed Jobey this question, Piotr replied that only the Spectrum RC
>> is currently implemented (not PPM). He hinted it would be possible
>> port the PPM stuff to Lisa/M. I suppose if you aren't using a pair of
>> spectrum satelites there would be two UARTs going spare, no idea if
>> some of that IO could be re-purposed for PPM input though.
>
> I wrote the spektrum parser so can give you a definite answer on this. YES
> the UART pins can be used as general purpose i/o and could be used for ppm
> input. I don’t think it would take that much effort to re-map to use one of
> those pins.
>
> Why would you want to though ? The Spektrum satellites can be purchased
> individually for less than $35 for a genuine Spektrum satellite receiver and
> the clone receivers can be had for $15
>
> Quality PPM receivers are not any cheaper than this and hacking a receiver to
> get ppm out adds risk whereas the Spektrums satellites need no modification.
> If you where not thinking of hacking a PPM receiver but instead using an
> encoder board then you end up with the ugliest wiring ever.
>
> I am really interested in hearing why it is better for you to use PPM it
> might hep with future development.
>
> Eric
>
>
>>
>> I didn't ask about open source hardware, but I did wonder :)
>>
>> Chris Gough
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Christoph Niemann
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Hi community,
>>>
>>> having a look at the wiki-site of the Lisa/M I was a little bit confused. Is
>>> the only possible RC Spektrum (and JR and Hobbyking)? Or is it also possible
>>> to use classic PPM and JETI 2.4Ghz?
>>> The other thing, that would matter in the process of deciding, whether to
>>> purchase it or not is, will it be OpenSource or not?
>>>
>>> Thanks for your answers
>>>
>>> Christoph
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> .
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
- [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Christoph Niemann, 2011/06/07
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Rui Costa, 2011/06/07
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Chris Gough, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Eric Parsonage, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions,
antoine drouin <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Chris Gough, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Christoph Niemann, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Eric Parsonage, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Felix Ruess, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Christoph Niemann, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Felix Ruess, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Eric Parsonage, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers, 2011/06/09
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Eric Parsonage, 2011/06/08
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Lisa/M questions, Martin Mueller, 2011/06/09