a) either full AHRS (with GPS) in the XSens -> MTiG, and make sure your Magnetometer is well calibrated and positioned such that it has no interference.
b) or the attitude is determined in paparazzi: Then you can also replace the XSens MTi with an Aspirin 2.0 IMU or something like that. The only advantage of the Mti would be it is more vibration resistant and calibrated.
So I personally do not see many reason to ever use an Mti. It is too slow for quadrotors, and not sufficiently compensated for airplanes, and if you do the compensation in paparazzi anyway there are cheaper options. The Mti-G on the other hand, with its aerospace (kalman) filter has proven to be a reliable AHRS when the magnetometer is well calibrated.
-Christophe
On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Rui Costa
<address@hidden> wrote:
Hello all,
I would like to know your opinion about this two configurations:
1. Lisa/L + MTi-G
2. Lisa/L + MTi + u-blox LEA GPS
The second option will be cheaper. But I don't know if it will work and in terms of performance what should be better?
It's for an fixed wing UAV of about 20Kg.
Cheers
Rui Costa
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel