|
From: | Felix Ruess |
Subject: | Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Drotek imu calibration problem |
Date: | Wed, 10 Apr 2013 20:03:05 +0200 |
Felix and anyone else who might know, i have one last question...
What ahrs subsystem is better for a fixed wing with bungee take off?
I used the float_dcm with 5g take off acceleration and it worked fine everytime so it a safe bet
but i would like to try something new like "float_cmpl_rmat" also.
On the ground i tested
<subsystem name="ahrs" type="float_cmpl_rmat">
<define name="AHRS_USE_GPS_HEADING"/>
<define name="AHRS_GRAVITY_UPDATE_COORDINATED_TURN"/>
<define name="AHRS_GRAVITY_UPDATE_NORM_HEURISTIC"/>
</subsystem>
<define name="USE_AHRS_GPS_ACCELERATIONS"/>
<configure name="USE_MAGNETOMETER" value="1"/>
and it works very well especially the magnetometer.
The magnetometer looks very precise (i have calibrated it and set the local magnetic field coefficients) when compared with a big navy compass and it does not jitter so i can't imagine why i should not use it.
Is the float_cmpl_rmat code able to fuse both gps and magnetometer heading?
Also is the "USE_AHRS_GPS_ACCELERATIONS" definition active (used) regardless of the AHRS subsystem used?
Thank you again for your help and time.
Chris
_______________________________________________
Paparazzi-devel mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |