[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Replacement for HITL
|
From: |
paparazzi_guy |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Replacement for HITL |
|
Date: |
Wed, 9 Apr 2014 15:15:24 -0700 (PDT) |
Sorry, I think you misunderstood me. I have read through the wiki pages and
created a flight plan where the UAV will dive to the ground under certain
circumstances. When using SITL the plane reacts as it should.
However, I was wondering if there was an alternative to HITL to *Physically
Demonstrate* that the plane will react the way it should.
I tried creating a new a/c using tiny_hitl.xml airframe and
hitl_fixedwing.xml for telemetry. However, after getting a variety of
errors, I started thinking about alternatives to HITL.
Also, thanks for replying to that other post. It looks like the latest
update of Paparazzi V5.0.4 fixes the sectors issue.
--
View this message in context:
http://lists.paparazziuav.org/Replacement-for-HITL-tp15068p15070.html
Sent from the paparazzi-devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.