Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results

parallel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results

From:	John Correira
Subject:	Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results
Date:	Mon, 21 Dec 2020 09:20:59 -0500

On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:08 AM Ole Tange <tange@gnu.org> wrote:

[ ] I don't care
[ x ] Change it - I would prefer the new behaviour
[ ] Keep as is (please give an example why the current behaviour works
better for you)

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, Ole Tange, 2020/12/19
- Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, Rob Sargent, 2020/12/19
- Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, John Correira <=
- Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, Dan Niedere, 2020/12/21
- Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, Penelope Fudd, 2020/12/21
- Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, or5pxsf7tq1x, 2020/12/19
  - Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results, Saint Michael, 2020/12/19

Prev by Date: Re: Feature request: --tag-json
Next by Date: Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results
Previous by thread: Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results
Next by thread: Re: VOTE: Changing the behaviour of --results
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread