Re: [pdf-devel] time module unit test cases

[gerel]

 > Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 23:04:49 -0300
 > From: <address@hidden>
 > 
 >  > Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2008 20:52:32 +0200
 >  > From: address@hidden
 >  > 
 >  > 
 >  >    I wanted to confirm one more thing, suppose i have created one object 
 > using
 >  >    *pdf_time_dup**.
 >  > 
 >  >    *So the contains of new object is similar to previous object. This 
 > test case
 >  >    is not unit test case right as this is functional test case.
 >  > 
 >  >    Say passing invalid object and see what is the behavior this can be 
 > unit
 >  >    test case right?*
 >  >    *
 >  > 
 >  > I dont fully understand you. In order to define unit test cases for
 >  > the `pdf_time_dup' function you should indeed use it. The fact that it
 >  > creates a new variable containing the same values as the parameters
 >  > do not invalidate it as a unit test case.
 > 
 > Anish I think we're not doing any specific type of tests, if that's your
 > doubt. BUT, you at least need to do "black-box" testing. If you want to do
 > "white-box" testing it's much better (I guess that's what you meant with
 > "functional test" since functional tests involves all the modules of
 > the library not only one).

Sorry if I wasn't clear, "functional testing" is something you should not do
now.

-gerel