[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: SPAM:17: RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this underNT/IIS?
From: |
Wade Weppler |
Subject: |
RE: SPAM:17: RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this underNT/IIS? |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:05:59 -0500 |
Apparently there were problems with older versions of Netscape? I'm not
positive. Mozilla seems to work fine here...
-wade
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Patrick Walsh (mr_e)
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:18 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: SPAM:17: RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this
> underNT/IIS?
>
> There's a knowledge base article floating around somewhere on
> Microsoft's site regarding this. They deny that it is a bug and cite
some
> http standard that they are adhering to by forbidding cookie and
location
> headers together. So don't expect them ever to fix it. Your refresh
fix
> is
> a neat trick. What are the effects of this? Is there any reason why
we
> shouldn't ban "Location:" headers altogether? Is it slower? Do only
some
> browsers support it?
>
> ..Patrick
>
>
> On 12/11/02 11:56 AM, "Wade Weppler" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > This should be fixed with my previous e-mail RE: changing all
> > "Location:" headers to "Refresh: 0; url=".
> >
> > Hopefully, someday, Microsoft will fix this bug! So far, IIS 4.0
(NT),
> > 5.0 (2000), and 5.1 (XP) all exhibit this bug.
> >
> > Apache on Win32 would be another choice, as I don't believe it has
the
> > same problem.
> >
> > Older versions of PHP also had problems passing session information
to
> > Internet Explorer. This was fixed, and is definitely fixed in
4.2.x.
> >
> > -wade
> >
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: address@hidden
> >> [mailto:address@hidden
On
> >> Behalf Of Patrick Walsh (mr_e)
> >> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 2:25 PM
> >> To: address@hidden
> >> Subject: Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under
NT/IIS?
> >>
> >> I recall another issue that was more diabolical under IIS. IIS
> >> doesn't
> >> let you set a cookie and redirect a page at the same time. This
means
> >> that
> >> when logging in there needs to be an intermediate page for the
> > redirect.
> >> It's a very annoying limitation, but it only causes problems in a
very
> > few
> >> places -- one of them is in the login screen. I might have my fix
> > around
> >> somewhere, but again, this was to version 0.9.12, so you won't be
able
> > to
> >> just drop it in.
> >>
> >> ..Patrick
> >>
> >>
> >> On 12/11/02 9:48 AM, "Seibar Ghoti" <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>
> >>>> I'm with you, I'm looking at PhpGroupware as a way to sell in to
> >> customers
> >>>> a Exchange alternate at a reasonable cost and of course just as
> >> importantly
> >>>> at a reasonable margin.
> >>>>
> >>> Precisely. Exchange right now is one of the main reasons shops
> > retain a
> >>> Windows-based infrastructure. Remove that, and the rest falls
like
> > a
> >> house
> >>> of cards.
> >>>
> >>> So, my problems were documented in the "Starting IIS Thread"
> > message,
> >> anyone
> >>> have an idea where the issues might be there? To recap:
> >>>
> >>> I got it mostly working by changing as many references of "/" to
> > "\\" as
> >>> needed to just get some pages to work. I know now that I
shouldn't
> > have
> >> to
> >>> do that, as SquirrelMail works fine, and it's littered with
> >> forwardslashes,
> >>> but that did fix it. I can go into the web config, add users,
> > change
> >> apps,
> >>> etc, but I get a blank login screen. All other progress halts on
> > that
> >>> little one.
> >>>
> >>> Anyone else have similar issues? How 'bout a general shout out
for
> > what
> >>> people have done to get it working, or mostly working? If we pool
> > it,
> >> the
> >>> solutions will come.
> >>>
> >>> ---
> >>> Answering the age-old question: Which is more painful? Going to
> > work,
> >> or
> >>> gouging your eye out with a spoon?
> >>> www.workorspoon.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _________________________________________________________________
> >>> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> >>> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Phpgroupware-users mailing list
> >>> address@hidden
> >>> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Phpgroupware-users mailing list
> >> address@hidden
> >> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Phpgroupware-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Phpgroupware-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/phpgroupware-users
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, (continued)
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Ruben Safir, 2002/12/11
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Chris Weiss, 2002/12/11
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Seibar Ghoti, 2002/12/11
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Patrick Walsh (mr_e), 2002/12/11
- [Phpgroupware-users] Attachements, Hsing-Foo Wang, 2002/12/11
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Attachements, Alex Borges (lex), 2002/12/11
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Attachements, Hsing-Foo Wang, 2002/12/11
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Attachements, Alex Borges (lex), 2002/12/11
RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Wade Weppler, 2002/12/11
RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Chris Weiss, 2002/12/11
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Chris Weiss, 2002/12/11
RE: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Seibar Ghoti, 2002/12/11
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] Is no one using this under NT/IIS?, Seibar Ghoti, 2002/12/11