[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw
From: |
Drago Bokal |
Subject: |
Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:41:02 +0100 |
At 21:10 22.12.2004, you wrote:
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 12:39 +0100, Drago Bokal wrote:
> Perhaps those interested in the question shall seek
> a second opinion in the corresponding egw resources.
And perhaps EGO developers can keep to their lists!
As much as PHPGW developers to their IRC channels.
I think that the public lists are open to anyone, and certainly
I said nothing offending. In the very least I have spat over
PHPGW as some PHPGW developer spat over EGW in
EGW's support IRC channels. I did not even advertise for EGW
and its features: if anyone is interested, (s)he can get such ads on
the EGW web resources (mailing lists, website, etc).
Indeed, as Chris has said: everyone shall try the difference himself.
I also think that the ex-collaborators shall behave reasonably and
objectively towards each other. It is non-objectivity in your replies
which made me type the words.
With kind regards to all,
Drago Bokal
- [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Marc Grober, 2004/12/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Dave Hall, 2004/12/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Chris Weiss, 2004/12/21
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Dave Hall, 2004/12/22
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw,
Drago Bokal <=
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Matt, 2004/12/22
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Matt, 2004/12/22
- Re: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Chris Weiss, 2004/12/22
- RE: [Phpgroupware-users] phpgw v egw, Matt, 2004/12/23