Re: next release criteria

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> I have another proposal.  How about we adopt "linux style" version
> numbers; ie: change the current CVS to 0.5.0, the next release will be
> 0.6.0.  Some of the bug reports that we're getting, say "version
> 0.4.0", and it's not always clear whether that means the released
> version, or a CVS snapshot.

I was actually doing this at one point, but there wasn't enough
stability in the codebase to really call anything "stable".
0.4.0 was supposed to be a "stable" release cycle (and it's held
up much better than previous releases).

-- 
Ben Pfaff 
email: address@hidden
web: http://benpfaff.org