Re: Pooled version of hash?

[Ben Pfaff]

John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:

> Would it be a good idea to have a version of hash.c which uses a pool
> to do its memory allocation?

Yes, that's a good idea.  I'd suggest just adding a pool
parameter to the existing hash_create function, then changing the
*malloc and free calls to pool_* and pool_free calls.  Callers
who don't want a pool can just pass a null pointer, because
pool_*malloc and pool_free interpret a null pointer as a request
to just call malloc or free.
-- 
"Platonically Evil Monkey has been symbolically representing the darkest 
 fears of humanity since the dawn of literature and religion, and I think
 I speak for everyone when I give it a sidelong glance of uneasy recognition 
 this evening." --Scrymarch