[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
[patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Nov 2006 05:37:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061024 Iceweasel/2.0 (Debian-2.0+dfsg-1) |
Update of patch #5562 (project pspp):
Status: Ready For Test/Review => Works For Me
Assigned to: blp => jmd
_______________________________________________________
Follow-up Comment #3:
I'm pretty happy with this. Nit-picking follows:
In prompt.[ch], could the functions be renamed to put "prompt" at the
beginning? e.g. get_prompt_style -> prompt_get_style and so on. This
would make it clear at a glance that they come from a module named
"prompt".
I think that the function source is only used in DO REPEAT. I wonder
whether it should be merged in with it. It seems like the
function_source is a really thin wrapper around getl_interface now; it
was less apparently "thin" before, because it *was* the exposed
interface. If you don't like merging it, could the source file be
named something less generic? Maybe "function-source.c"?
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.gnu.org/patch/?5562>
_______________________________________________
Message sent via/by Savannah
http://savannah.gnu.org/
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/16
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/16
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, Ben Pfaff, 2006/11/18
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, Ben Pfaff, 2006/11/24
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/26
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/26
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/29
- [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, John Darrington, 2006/11/29
- Re: [patch #5562] line-buffer / getl_ reorganisation, Ben Pfaff, 2006/11/28