[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post 0.6.0 releases.
From: |
Ben Pfaff |
Subject: |
Re: Post 0.6.0 releases. |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:39:04 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
John Darrington <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 09:53:13PM -0700, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> After the release, I want to try to get out bug-fix releases, at
> least, on a more frequent basis than we've been doing. Let's see
> how that goes.
>
> I suggest that we maintain three branches.
>
> 1. A branch containing the current release patched with bug-fixes.
>
> 2. A branch containing 1 (above) patched with enhancements.
> "Enhancements" in this context means changes which provide new
> functionality without requiring major code reorganisation. Eg new
> commands which don't require low level library modification.
>
> 3. A branch containing 2. patched with any changes which don't fit
> the above criteria.
Is there some existing project that uses a similar scheme? I am
familiar with projects that have a bug fix-only branch and a
development branch, but I am a little concerned that maintaining
both #2 and #3 could cause a lot of extra work.
--
Ben Pfaff
http://benpfaff.org
Post 0.6.0 releases., John Darrington, 2008/06/06
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases.,
Ben Pfaff <=
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases., John Darrington, 2008/06/06
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases., Ben Pfaff, 2008/06/07
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases., Ben Pfaff, 2008/06/09
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases., John Darrington, 2008/06/10
- Re: Post 0.6.0 releases., Ben Pfaff, 2008/06/10
Branch topology [was Re: Post 0.6.0 releases.], John Darrington, 2008/06/13
Re: Branch topology, Ben Pfaff, 2008/06/14
Re: 0.6.0-rc1 available, Jason Stover, 2008/06/06
Re: 0.6.0-rc1 available, John Darrington, 2008/06/07