[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Problem with frequencies
From: |
John Darrington |
Subject: |
Re: Problem with frequencies |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2009 13:20:23 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
I can only get something similar to this if I do:
data list list /uf * w (f5.0).
begin data.
1 1123456789
2 9098765432
3 5432198766
end data.
weight by w.
FREQUENCIES
/VARIABLES=UF
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLE.
so like Ben suggests, it seems to indicate a weight variable with a
very short format.
Can you post the output of
SYSFILE INFO FILE='PES_PNAD2007.sav'.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 01:39:03AM -0300, michel wrote:
> Some of the code in FREQUENCIES in the output display code has
> changed recently, so what version of PSPP is this? You can give
> the Git commit number or, failing that, the name of the branch
> and the date on which you last updated from it.
It's the master branch from 20090413.
> Does PES_PNAD2007.sav have a weighting variable? If so, what is
> its format?
What is an "weighting variable"?
If before the frequency I run an "SAMPLE .1", some values appears
correctly,
and if I do a "SAMPLE .01" almost everyone appears correctly.
Seems like the ones who doesn't appears always are represented as five
asterisks. Maybe if
the output have more then 5 digits we get this problem. Look at this
output, with only 10% of the cases.
The only ones who appears are the smallest values.
#===============#========#=========#========#========#========#
|Rond#nia | 11| *****| ,89| ,89| ,89|
|Acre | 12| 65635| ,34| ,34| 1,23|
|Amazonas | 13| *****| 1,86| 1,86| 3,09|
|Roraima | 14| 39722| ,21| ,21| 3,30|
|Par# | 15| *****| 3,84| 3,84| 7,13|
|Amap# | 16| 66810| ,35| ,35| 7,48|
|Tocantins | 17| *****| ,72| ,72| 8,21|
|Maranh#o | 21| *****| 3,36| 3,36| 11,56|
|Piau# | 22| *****| 1,59| 1,59| 13,15|
|Cear# | 23| *****| 4,47| 4,47| 17,62|
|Rio Grande do | 24| *****| 1,59| 1,59| 19,22|
|Para#ba | 25| *****| 1,91| 1,91| 21,13|
|Pernambuco | 26| *****| 4,62| 4,62| 25,75|
|Alagoas | 27| *****| 1,53| 1,53| 27,28|
|Sergipe | 28| *****| 1,06| 1,06| 28,34|
|Bahia | 29| *****| 7,46| 7,46| 35,80|
|Minas Gerais | 31| *****| 10,29| 10,29| 46,09|
|Esp#rito Santo | 32| *****| 1,97| 1,97| 48,06|
|Rio de Janeiro | 33| *****| 8,37| 8,37| 56,43|
|S#o Paulo | 35| *****| 22,00| 22,00| 78,43|
|Paran# | 41| *****| 5,46| 5,46| 83,89|
|Santa Catarina | 42| *****| 3,05| 3,05| 86,93|
|Rio Grande do | 43| *****| 5,92| 5,92| 92,85|
|Mato Grosso do | 50| *****| 1,15| 1,15| 94,00|
|Mato Grosso | 51| *****| 1,54| 1,54| 95,55|
|Goi#s | 52| *****| 3,18| 3,18| 98,73|
|Distrito | 53| *****| 1,27| 1,27| 100,00|
#===============#========#=========#========#========#========#
_______________________________________________
pspp-dev mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/pspp-dev
--
PGP Public key ID: 1024D/2DE827B3
fingerprint = 8797 A26D 0854 2EAB 0285 A290 8A67 719C 2DE8 27B3
See http://pgp.mit.edu or any PGP keyserver for public key.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature